Xeon Platinum 8352M vs EPYC 9124
Xeon Platinum 8352M
EPYC 9124
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352M
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9124
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,083) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+306%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) | ✅ More affordable ($1,083) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8352M and EPYC 9124
Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 9124
The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8352M packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9124 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9124 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9124 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8352M scores 44,406 against the EPYC 9124's 43,638 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352M. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 44,406+2% | 43,638 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,770 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8352M uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9124 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9124 — the Xeon Platinum 8352M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 12 (EPYC 9124). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs 128 (EPYC 9124) — the EPYC 9124 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M) and SP5 (EPYC 9124).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144 GB+157286300% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9124). Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543; EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8352M launched at $4471 MSRP, while the EPYC 9124 debuted at $1083. At current prices ($4471 vs $1083), the EPYC 9124 is $3388 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8352M delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 40.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9124 — making the EPYC 9124 the 120.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8352M | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4471 | $1083-76% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4471 | $1083-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 40.3+307% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8352M and EPYC 9124
