
Xeon W-2195

Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 536.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 220W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 27,977).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 220W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-2195
The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-2195 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2195 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-2195 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-2195 scores 27,977 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Xeon W-2195 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+50% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+10% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total)+38% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,977 | 27,822 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,002 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-2195 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W-2195 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 512 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Xeon W-2195 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon W-2195 was priced at $150, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($150 vs $949), Xeon W-2195 was $799 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-2195 delivers 186.5 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 145.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-2195 | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-84% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 186.5+537% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















