Xeon W-3265M vs Core i5-10400F
Xeon W-3265M
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1159%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265M and Core i5-10400F
Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3265M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265M scores 35,506 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 92.6% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB+175% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 35,506+173% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3265M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Xeon W-3265M supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3265M) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+73225% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 128 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+300% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3265M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3265M launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($3500 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $3398 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3265M delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 170.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $160-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $102-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 127.7+1164% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3265M and Core i5-10400F
