CPU
GPU
Xeon W-3265M
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3265M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265M scores 35,506 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's 35,133 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB+38% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 35,506+1% | 35,133 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3265M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M versus 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 256 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3265M) and FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370).
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 7500+156% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024+300% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+300% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402; Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3265M launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 debuted at $0. At current prices ($3500 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is $3500 cheaper.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
