Xeon W-3265M
VS
Core i7-13700

Xeon W-3265M vs Core i7-13700

Intel

Xeon W-3265M

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-13700

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M

#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
133%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
132%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
132%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
130%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
130%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
130%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
128%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
120%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
113%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
111%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
109%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
107%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
107%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
107%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
101%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
100%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
68%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
67%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
65%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
56%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700

#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
107%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
106%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
103%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
103%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
102%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
102%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
102%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
101%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
101%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
101%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
101%
#172
Core i9-13900KS
MSRP: $699|Avg: $580
101%
#173
Ryzen 5 2400G
MSRP: $169|Avg: $84
100%
#174
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
MSRP: $699|Avg: $675
100%
#175
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $105.5
100%
#176
Core i7-13700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
100%
#177
Athlon 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
99%
#178
Core i5-13500E
MSRP: $235|Avg: $235
99%
#179
Core i5-12500E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $200
99%
#180
Core i9-11900
MSRP: $439|Avg: $220
98%
#181
Core i7-12700E
MSRP: $314|Avg: $278
98%
#182
Core i3-14100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $135
98%
#183
Core i5-13400T
MSRP: $221|Avg: $200
98%
#184
Core i3-12300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
97%
#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
97%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
96%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
96%
#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
95%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
95%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
95%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($3,500) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3265M is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500)
More affordable ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-13700 ($350), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($3,150 less, 90% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+920%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500)
More affordable ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700

Intel

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

Intel

Core i7-13700

The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3265M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i7-13700 offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265M scores 35,506 against the Core i7-13700's 36,230 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700.

FeatureXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 24
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
33 MB+10%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
24 MB+1100%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
35,506
36,230+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3265M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700 — the Xeon W-3265M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 192 GB 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 2 (Core i7-13700). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 20 (Core i7-13700) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3265M) and Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700).

FeatureXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
Socket
LGA3647
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
2933+58560%
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
1024
192 GB+19660700%
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64+220%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

FeatureXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W-3265M launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700 debuted at $384. At current prices ($3500 vs $350), the Core i7-13700 is $3150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3265M delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 103.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700 — making the Core i7-13700 the 164.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon W-3265MCore i7-13700
MSRP
$6300
$384-94%
Avg Price (30d)
$3500
$350-90%
Performance per Dollar
10.1
103.5+925%
Release Date
2019
2023