Xeon W-3265M vs Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon W-3265M
Xeon Gold 5416S
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265M
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 5416S
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($1,445) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+142%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,500) | ✅ More affordable ($1,445) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon W-3265M
The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.
Xeon Gold 5416S
The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3265M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S — a 14% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon W-3265M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265M scores 35,506 against the Xeon Gold 5416S's 35,515 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M vs 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB+10% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 35,506 | 35,515 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3265M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5416S uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M versus 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265M) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon W-3265M) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S).
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933 | 4400+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 4096+300% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3265M launched at $6300 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5416S debuted at $1445.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265M | Xeon Gold 5416S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $1445-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 5416S
