Xeon W-3275 vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Xeon W-3275
Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+502%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($140) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 7 3700X
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon W-3275 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275 scores 41,267 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 59.1% lead for the Xeon W-3275. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+250% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB+20% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+5500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 41,267+84% | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Xeon W-3275 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3275) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 128 GB+13107100% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3275 launched at $4449 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($1550 vs $140), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1410 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 160.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 143% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4449 | $329-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1550 | $140-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 160.2+502% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 7 3700X
