Xeon W-3345 vs EPYC 9224
Xeon W-3345
EPYC 9224
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3345
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9224
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,319) | ✅ More affordable ($1,199) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+179%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,319) | ✅ More affordable ($1,199) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 9224
Xeon W-3345
The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 9224 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3345 uses the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3345 scores 48,140 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 9224. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224.
| Feature | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-W (2021) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 48,140 | 48,573 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3345 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9224 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3345 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9224 — the EPYC 9224 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon W-3345) vs 12 (EPYC 9224). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).
| Feature | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3345) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3345 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the EPYC 9224 debuted at $1825. At current prices ($3319 vs $1199), the EPYC 9224 is $2120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3345 delivers 14.5 pts/$ vs 40.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9224 — making the EPYC 9224 the 94.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3345 | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1825-27% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3319 | $1199-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.5 | 40.5+179% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 9224
