Xeon w9-3595X vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Xeon w9-3595X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3595X
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+302%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($1,419) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w9-3595X and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Processing Power
The Xeon w9-3595X packs 60 cores / 120 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Xeon w9-3595X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w9-3595X scores 97,534 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X's 92,808 — a 5% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 130,000 vs 41,000 (104.1% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 3,200, a 32.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,118 vs 26,000 (41.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). L3 cache: 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 60 / 120+150% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+110% |
| L3 Cache | 112.5 MB | 128 MB (total)+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 97,534+5% | 92,808 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 130,000+217% | 41,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 3,200+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,118 | 26,000+52% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w9-3595X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w9-3595X) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X).
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+27% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation, Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering. Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX; Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Content Creation / Rendering |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w9-3595X launched at $5889 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X debuted at $1499. At current prices ($6000 vs $1419), the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is $4581 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w9-3595X delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 65.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X the 120.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3595X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5889 | $1499-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6000 | $1419-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 65.4+301% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon w9-3595X and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
