A10-7890K vs Xeon E5-2418L

A10-7890K vs Xeon E5-2418L Performance Spectrum

A10-7890K

4 / 4

3,537

+0.5%

Athlon II X3 460

Athlon II X4 641

Athlon X4 850

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

Ryzen 7 6800HS

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2418L

4 / 8

3,518

0.0%

Core i7-3689Y

Pentium Gold 5405U

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7890K vs Xeon E5-2418L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7890K vs Xeon E5-2418L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7890K

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon E5-2418L needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2418L.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2418L, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Xeon E5-2418L

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,518 vs 3,537).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7890K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7890K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7890K better than Xeon E5-2418L?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2418L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-7890K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7890K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7890K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7890K still makes the most sense overall. A10-7890K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7890K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7890K vs Xeon E5-2418L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7890K

The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.

Xeon E5-2418L

The Xeon E5-2418L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,518 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2418L's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2418L — a 68.7% clock advantage for the A10-7890K (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Xeon E5-2418L's 3,518 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-7890K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2418L.

Feature	A10-7890K	Xeon E5-2418L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+105%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+100%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	3,537	3,518
Geekbench 6 Single	600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7890K	Xeon E5-2418L
Socket	FM2+	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7890K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2418L). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon E5-2418L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100.