A10-8700P vs Core i5-12400F

CPU

GPU

A10-8700P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-8700P vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

+766.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅+52.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +287.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 647.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and older memory support.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-8700P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 1,000).
❌
16% HIGHER MSRP
$174 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-8700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than A10-8700P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 287.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P pulls ahead with 52.2% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P is the stronger fit. You are getting 52.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 16.0% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 287.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A10-8700P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 52.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 647.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 158.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 1,700, a 111.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,000 vs 657 (41.4% advantage for the A10-8700P).

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	—	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	2,254	19,532+767%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	480	1,700+254%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000+52%	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-12400F
Socket	FP4	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+125%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	20+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A10-8700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Gaming Performance/Value

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-8700P was priced at $150, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($150 vs $174), A10-8700P was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-8700P delivers 15.0 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 152.8% better value option.

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-12400F
MSRP	$150-14%	$174
Performance per Dollar	15.0	112.3+649%
Release Date	2015	2022

Search A10-8700P on Amazon

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.