
A10-8700P

Pentium P6100
A10-8700P vs Pentium P6100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-8700P vs Pentium P6100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Civilization VI

Genshin Impact

Hearts of Iron IV

Team Fortress 2
A10-8700P vs Pentium P6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-8700P
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Pentium P6100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 22.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Pentium P6100
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.4 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-8700P across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,254).
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-8700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-8700P better than Pentium P6100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-8700P vs Pentium P6100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P
The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Pentium P6100
The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-8700P.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,254 | 2,245 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-8700P) / not specified (Pentium P6100). The A10-8700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Pentium P6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-8700P was priced at $150, while the Pentium P6100 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($150 vs $100), Pentium P6100 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-8700P delivers 15.0 pts/$ vs 22.4 pts/$ for the Pentium P6100 — making the Pentium P6100 the 39.6% better value option.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0 | 22.4+49% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















