
A10-9700E

Ryzen 9 5900X
A10-9700E vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-9700E vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-9700E vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-9700E
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,250 vs 38,955).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +297.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-9700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700E.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than A10-9700E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9700E vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E
The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 169.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 2,174, a 113.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | A10-9700E | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 3,250 | 38,955+1099% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 600 | 2,174+262% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700E) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700E) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | A10-9700E | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | A10-9700E | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Low Power | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













