A10G vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10G

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

159%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

139%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

130%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

130%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

128%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

124%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

123%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

118%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

115%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

113%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

112%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

110%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

108%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

102%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

100%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

99%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

98%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

94%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

92%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

81%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

80%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

77%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

77%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

75%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

69%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

67%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The A10G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 72.8% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+72.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-72.8%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $2,000 for the A10G, it costs 96% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 1443.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1443.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

A10G Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce GTX 1650

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the A10G leads by 72.8%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	13,598+73%	7,869
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	9216+929%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.52 TFLOPS+956%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+3%	1665 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	288+414%	56
L1 Cache	9 MB+923%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The A10G offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+500%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 70°C.

Feature	A10G	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	Unknown-100%	70°C
Perf/Watt	90.7	104.9+16%

💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 96.3% less ($1925 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (A10G) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1442.6% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).