
A4-1250

Core i5-12400F
A4-1250 vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-1250 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-1250 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-1250
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (188 vs 657).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FT3, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +568.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 792.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FT3 and older memory support.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A4-1250.
Trade-offs
- ❌74% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than A4-1250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-1250 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 125.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 175.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 111 vs 1,700, a 175.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 188 vs 657 (111% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+340% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 19,532+1453% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | 1,700+1432% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | 657+249% |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (A4-1250) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Tablet | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($100 vs $174), A4-1250 was $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 159.7% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-43% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 112.3+791% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















