A4-1250 vs Pentium N3700

A4-1250 vs Pentium N3700 Performance Spectrum

A4-1250

2 / 2

1,258

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium N3700

4 / 4

1,248

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1250 vs Pentium N3700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1250 vs Pentium N3700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1250

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Pentium N3700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Pentium N3700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 8W vs 6W.

Pentium N3700

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 8W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,248 vs 1,258).
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3700 better than A4-1250?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3700 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-1250 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-1250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3700 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium N3700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data. A4-1250 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1250 vs Pentium N3700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium N3700

The Pentium N3700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium N3700 — a 82.4% clock advantage for the Pentium N3700. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3700 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Pentium N3700's 1,248 — a 0.8% lead for the A4-1250. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium N3700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.4 GHz+140%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,258	1,248
Geekbench 6 Single	111	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	188	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3700 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-1250	Pentium N3700
Socket	FT3	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L 1333 MHz	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Pentium N3700). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Pentium N3700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.