
A4-3310MX

Ryzen 7 3700X
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-3310MX
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 22,430).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +736.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while A4-3310MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A4-3310MX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX
The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The A4-3310MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 55.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 179.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3310MX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+76% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,190 | 22,430+1785% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 273 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3310MX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3310MX) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6480G | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













