A4 PRO-3340B
VS
Core i5-12400F

A4 PRO-3340B vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

A4 PRO-3340B

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A4 PRO-3340B is positioned at rank #637 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4 PRO-3340B

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
99%
#625
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
858%
#626
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
846%
#627
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
776%
#628
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
773%
#629
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
766%
#631
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
740%
#632
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
709%
#633
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
708%
#634
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
689%
#637
A4 PRO-3340B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA4 PRO-3340BCore i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A4 PRO-3340B (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3/DDR3L-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA4 PRO-3340BCore i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4 PRO-3340B and Core i5-12400F

AMD

A4 PRO-3340B

The A4 PRO-3340B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 December 2014 (10 years ago). It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,709 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The A4 PRO-3340B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4 PRO-3340B versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A4 PRO-3340B uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A4 PRO-3340B scores 1,709 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 167.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 200 vs 1,700, a 157.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4 PRO-3340BCore i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
4.4 GHz+100%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
28 nm
Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture
Kabini (2013−2014)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
1,709
19,532+1043%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
200
1,700+750%
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 PRO-3340B uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4 PRO-3340B versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 PRO-3340B) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4 PRO-3340BCore i5-12400F
Socket
FT3
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
20+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 PRO-3340B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A4 PRO-3340B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8240), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 PRO-3340B targets Business Laptop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A4 PRO-3340B rivals Pentium N3520; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureA4 PRO-3340BCore i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8240
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Business Laptop
Gaming Performance/Value