
A6-9220e

Core i5-12400F
A6-9220e vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-9220e vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-9220e vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-9220e
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,056 vs 19,532).
- βOlder platform position on BGA with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +696.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA and DDR4.
- β 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A6-9220e.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while A6-9220e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A6-9220e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than A6-9220e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-9220e vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220e
The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The A6-9220e packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F β a 58.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 β a 179.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | A6-9220e | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+83% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | β | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016β2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 1,056 | 19,532+1750% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F β the Core i5-12400F supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) β the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | A6-9220e | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+125% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A6-9220e includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A6-9220e | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R4 | β |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















