Arc 8-Core iGPU
VS
Quadro M2000M

Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Quadro M2000M

Intel

Arc 8-Core iGPU

2023Boost: 2300 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is positioned at rank 417 and the Quadro M2000M is on rank 177, so the Quadro M2000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU

#407
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1560%
#409
1414%
#410
1410%
#414
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1282%
#415
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1274%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
100%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
99%
#419
99%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
99%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
98%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
96%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
96%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#431
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#432
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M

#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
99%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
98%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
94%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
92%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
90%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
89%
#162
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2166%
#177
Quadro M2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
97%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
96%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
94%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
93%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
93%
#186
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
92%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
91%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
90%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity
Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc 8-Core iGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc 8-Core iGPU and Quadro M2000M

Intel

Arc 8-Core iGPU

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc 8-Core iGPU scores 3,500 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1098 MHz.

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
G3D Mark Score
3,500+3%
3,410
Architecture
Xe LPG
Maxwell
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
8
640+7900%
Boost Clock
2300 MHz+109%
1098 MHz
L1 Cache
1.5 MB+384%
0.31 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc 8-Core iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000M has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M).

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc 8-Core iGPU draws 45W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 20% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
TDP
45W-18%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
77.8+25%
62.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureArc 8-Core iGPUQuadro M2000M
MSRP
$503
Avg Price (30d)
$400
Codename
Meteor Lake iGPU
GM107
Release
December 14 2023
December 3 2015
Ranking
#362
#550