
Arc A580

GeForce GTX 1650
Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅81.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 271mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 271mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A580 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A580 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A580 scores 12,060 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc A580 leads by 53.3%. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060+53% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+243% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+312% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+20% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+243% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A580 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. Arc A580 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A580) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A580. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A580 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+300% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 271mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 75W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Length | 271mm | 229mm |
| Height | 132mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 104.9+52% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A580 came in at $179, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 16.8% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A580 offers 27.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc A580 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $149-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+28% | 52.8 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU117 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #223 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















