
Athlon 300U

Ryzen 7 3700X
Athlon 300U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 300U vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 300U vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 300U
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 3, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,861 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +215.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Athlon 300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Athlon 300U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon 300U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 300U vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 300U
The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Athlon 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 300U scores 3,861 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 141.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 300U vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge 2 (2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 3,861 | 22,430+481% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 900 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,800 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon 300U versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Athlon 300U) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (Athlon 300U) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 300U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Athlon 300U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 3), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon 300U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon RX Vega 3 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













