Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G3220T

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3220T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G3220T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G3220T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G3220T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 30.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $54 MSRP).
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Pentium G3220T

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $445 less on MSRP ($54 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 819.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.5 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($54 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,649 vs 1,658).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-74 better than Pentium G3220T?
Yes. Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon 64 FX-74 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 FX-74 comes in 824.1% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $54 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3220T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 819.1% better value on paper (30.5 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G3220T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Pentium G3220T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Intel

Pentium G3220T

The Pentium G3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,649 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium G3220T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium G3220T — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium G3220T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Pentium G3220T's 1,649 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-74 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220T.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Pentium G3220T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+15%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
90 nm
22 nm-76%
Architecture
Windsor (2006−2007)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,658
1,649
Geekbench 6 Single
400
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3220T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Pentium G3220T
Socket
F
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Pentium G3220T). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Pentium G3220T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-74 was priced at $499, while the Pentium G3220T came in at $54. On launch pricing ($499 vs $54), Pentium G3220T was $445 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-74 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 30.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3220T — making the Pentium G3220T the 160.7% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Pentium G3220T
MSRP
$499
$54-89%
Performance per Dollar
3.3
30.5+824%
Release Date
2006
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.