
Athlon II X2 245

Core 2 Extreme X7900
Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 245
2009Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Extreme X7900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $66 MSRP, while Core 2 Extreme X7900 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Core 2 Extreme X7900
2007Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,115 vs 1,134).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 245 better than Core 2 Extreme X7900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

Core 2 Extreme X7900
The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $851.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 245 and Core 2 Extreme X7900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Core 2 Extreme X7900's 1,115 — a 1.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 245. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Extreme X7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+4% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+4% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,134+2% | 1,115 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 245 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — the Athlon II X2 245 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Extreme X7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Extreme X7900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 245) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme X7900). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme X7900 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 245 | Core 2 Extreme X7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















