Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900

AMD

Athlon II X2 245

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 245

2009

Why buy it

  • Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Extreme X7900.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $66 MSRP, while Core 2 Extreme X7900 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Core 2 Extreme X7900

2007

Why buy it

  • Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,115 vs 1,134).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 245 better than Core 2 Extreme X7900?
Yes. Athlon II X2 245 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 245 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon II X2 245 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $66 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 245 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 245 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X2 245

The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme X7900

The Core 2 Extreme X7900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $851.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 245 and Core 2 Extreme X7900 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon II X2 245 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 245 scores 1,134 against the Core 2 Extreme X7900's 1,115 — a 1.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 245. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X2 245Core 2 Extreme X7900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,134+2%
1,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 245 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Extreme X7900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Extreme X7900 — the Athlon II X2 245 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureAthlon II X2 245Core 2 Extreme X7900
Socket
AM3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Extreme X7900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 245) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme X7900). Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme X7900 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.

FeatureAthlon II X2 245Core 2 Extreme X7900
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile