Atom D510 vs Athlon 64 3200+
Atom D510
Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D510 is positioned at rank 626 and the Athlon 64 3200+ is on rank 1118, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom D510
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom D510 | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom D510 | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom D510 and Athlon 64 3200+
Atom D510
The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.
Athlon 64 3200+
The Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Atom D510 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 3200+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3200+ — a 18% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3200+. The Atom D510 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 3200+ uses Clawhammer (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Athlon 64 3200+'s 505 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom D510. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom D510 | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.67 GHz | 2 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | Clawhammer (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 525+4% | 505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3200+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 versus DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3200+ — the Atom D510 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D510) vs 2 (Athlon 64 3200+). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D510) vs 16 (Athlon 64 3200+) — the Athlon 64 3200+ offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: NM10 (Atom D510) and Socket 939,Socket 754 (Athlon 64 3200+).
| Feature | Atom D510 | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800+100% | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Atom D510) vs false (Athlon 64 3200+). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 3200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop.
| Feature | Atom D510 | Athlon 64 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | false |
| Target Use | Nettop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom D510 and Athlon 64 3200+
