Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium T4400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Pentium T4400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T4400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-E3930 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,185).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌438.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 6.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-E3930 better than Pentium T4400?

Yes. Atom x5-E3930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x5-E3930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-E3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-E3930 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom x5-E3930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T4400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-E3930 is built on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom x5-E3930. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E3930 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.2 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	—
PassMark	1,185	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	—	249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3930 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium T4400 — the Atom x5-E3930 supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E3930) vs 0 (Pentium T4400) — the Atom x5-E3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3930) and GL40,GM45 (Pentium T4400).

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Pentium T4400
Socket	FCBGA1296	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866+133%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E3930) / None (Pentium T4400). The Atom x5-E3930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.