
Atom x5-E3930

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Atom x5-E3930 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x5-E3930 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x5-E3930 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x5-E3930
2016Why buy it
- β Draws 7W instead of 120W, a 114W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,185 vs 34,293).
- βOlder platform position on FCBGA1296, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +820.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1296 and older memory support.
- β 600% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β1746.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 6.5W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Atom x5-E3930?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x5-E3930 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930
The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014β2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-E3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β a 94.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 1.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Atom x5-E3930 uses the Apollo Lake (2014β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 β a 186.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E3930 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Atom x5-E3930 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 5 GHz+178% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+238% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014β2016) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 1,185 | 34,293+2794% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3930 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 178.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E3930) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3930) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Atom x5-E3930 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1866 | DDR5-5200+179% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 28+600% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E3930) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics β Intel HD Graphics 500 (Atom x5-E3930) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Atom x5-E3930 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













