Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-13400F

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (16 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,188 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +310.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7211RE.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Atom x7211RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Atom x7211RE?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 310.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1043.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 310.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1043.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 310.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211RE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 167.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.5 GHz+150%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	2,188	25,029+1044%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Atom x7211RE	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.