
Atom x7211RE
Popular choices:

Core i5-3437U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Atom x7211RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1023 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-3437U
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,166 vs 2,188).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1023, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Atom x7211RE
2024Core i5-3437U
2013Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1023 and older memory support.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,166 vs 2,188).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1023, while Atom x7211RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7211RE better than Core i5-3437U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211RE and Core i5-3437U

Atom x7211RE
Atom x7211RE
The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-3437U
Core i5-3437U
The Core i5-3437U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,166 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom x7211RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3437U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-3437U — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Atom x7211RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-3437U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211RE scores 2,188 against the Core i5-3437U's 2,166 — a 1% lead for the Atom x7211RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3437U.
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 1.9 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,188+1% | 2,166 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 440 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,080 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7211RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-3437U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3437U — the Atom x7211RE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211RE) vs 2 (Core i5-3437U). PCIe lanes: 8 (Atom x7211RE) vs 16 (Core i5-3437U) — the Core i5-3437U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE) and QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3437U).
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-4800+67% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3437U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded, Core i5-3437U targets Business Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i5-3437U rivals AMD A8-4555M.
| Feature | Atom x7211RE | Core i5-3437U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (16 EU) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | Business Ultrabook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












