
Atom x7213RE

Celeron 7305
Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7213RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Celeron 7305
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅122.2% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,538).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Atom x7213RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 15W vs 9W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7213RE better than Celeron 7305?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7213RE
The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom x7213RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 7305 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 — a 102.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE. The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron 7305 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Celeron 7305's 2,520 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom x7213RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 5 / 5+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+209% | 1.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,538 | 2,520 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,422 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 641 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,598 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron 7305 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Celeron 7305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7213RE) vs 2 (Celeron 7305). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7213RE) vs 20 (Celeron 7305) — the Celeron 7305 offers 11 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7213RE) and Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305).
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 20+122% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7213RE) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7213RE) and UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













