Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305

Intel

Atom x7213RE

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron 7305

5 Cores5 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7213RE

2024

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 9W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 7305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Celeron 7305

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 122.2% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 2,538).
  • Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Atom x7213RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 15W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7213RE better than Celeron 7305?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 7305 is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7213RE pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Celeron 7305 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7213RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom x7213RE is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x7213RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Celeron 7305 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 5/5. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron 7305 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom x7213RE

The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Celeron 7305

The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom x7213RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 7305 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 — a 102.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE. The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron 7305 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Celeron 7305's 2,520 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom x7213RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305.

FeatureAtom x7213RECeleron 7305
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
5 / 5+150%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+209%
1.1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Alder Lake-U (2022)
PassMark
2,538
2,520
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,422
Geekbench 6 Single
641
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,598
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron 7305 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Celeron 7305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7213RE) vs 2 (Celeron 7305). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7213RE) vs 20 (Celeron 7305) — the Celeron 7305 offers 11 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7213RE) and Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305).

FeatureAtom x7213RECeleron 7305
Socket
FCBGA1264
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
9
20+122%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7213RE) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7213RE) and UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (Celeron 7305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.

FeatureAtom x7213RECeleron 7305
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)
UHD Graphics for 12th Gen
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget