Atom x7213RE vs Xeon X3370

Intel

Atom x7213RE

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3370

95 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7213RE vs Xeon X3370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7213RE vs Xeon X3370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7213RE vs Xeon X3370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7213RE

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 9W instead of 95W, a 86W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA775 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Xeon X3370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,538 vs 2,544).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon X3370

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 955.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 9W.
  • Older platform position on LGA775, while Atom x7213RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom x7213RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3370 better than Atom x7213RE?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom x7213RE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon X3370 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2008) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA775. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7213RE vs Xeon X3370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom x7213RE

The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Xeon X3370

The Xeon X3370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Atom x7213RE is built on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Xeon X3370's 2,544 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X3370. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3370.

FeatureAtom x7213REXeon X3370
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)
Process
10 nm-78%
45 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
2,538
2,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X3370 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom x7213REXeon X3370
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
9
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x7213RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Xeon X3370 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x7213REXeon X3370
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)