
Atom x7213RE

Core 2 Duo T7700
Atom x7213RE vs Core 2 Duo T7700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7213RE vs Core 2 Duo T7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7213RE vs Core 2 Duo T7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7213RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA478 and older memory support.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Core 2 Duo T7700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T7700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,538 vs 2,554).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 9W vs 4W.
Core 2 Duo T7700
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 9W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on PGA478, while Atom x7213RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7213RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T7700 better than Atom x7213RE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE vs Core 2 Duo T7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7213RE
The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Core 2 Duo T7700
The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.
Processing Power
Both the Atom x7213RE and Core 2 Duo T7700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Core 2 Duo T7700's 2,554 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7700. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 4 MB+100% |
| Process | 10 nm-85% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,538 | 2,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 254 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7213RE versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7700 — the Atom x7213RE supports 619.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7213RE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7213RE) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T7700). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7213RE) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo T7700) — the Core 2 Duo T7700 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7213RE) and GL960,GME965,GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7700).
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+264% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+620% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7213RE) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700). The Atom x7213RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core 2 Duo T7700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core 2 Duo T7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













