
Atom x7213RE

Core i5-750
Atom x7213RE vs Core i5-750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7213RE vs Core i5-750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7213RE vs Core i5-750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7213RE
2024Why buy it
- β Draws 9W instead of 95W, a 86W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1156 and older memory support.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Core i5-750 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,538 vs 2,546).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.
Core i5-750
2009Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7213RE.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $210 MSRP, while Atom x7213RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β955.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 9W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1156, while Atom x7213RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Atom x7213RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7213RE better than Core i5-750?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE vs Core i5-750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7213RE
The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Atom x7213RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 β a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE (base: 2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 β a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-750. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.66 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024β2025) | Lynnfield (2009β2010) |
| PassMark | 2,538 | 2,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 424 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7213RE versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 β the Atom x7213RE supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7213RE) vs 2 (Core i5-750). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7213RE) vs 16 (Core i5-750) β the Core i5-750 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7213RE) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+260% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7213RE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Atom x7213RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | None |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













