
Atom x7213RE

Core i3-4100M
Atom x7213RE vs Core i3-4100M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7213RE vs Core i3-4100M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7213RE vs Core i3-4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7213RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i3-4100M
2013Why buy it
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,531 vs 2,538).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Atom x7213RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.
- ❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Atom x7213RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7213RE better than Core i3-4100M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7213RE vs Core i3-4100M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7213RE
The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-4100M
The Core i3-4100M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,531 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Atom x7213RE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4100M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-4100M — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-4100M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Core i3-4100M's 2,531 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom x7213RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4100M.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i3-4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,538 | 2,531 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-4100M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7213RE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100M — the Atom x7213RE supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4100M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7213RE) vs 2 (Core i3-4100M). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7213RE) vs 16 (Core i3-4100M) — the Core i3-4100M offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i3-4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+200% | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7213RE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4100M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7213RE) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4100M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100M targets Mobile.
| Feature | Atom x7213RE | Core i3-4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













