Atom x7213RE vs Celeron M P4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron M P4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron M P4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7213RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 512W, a 503W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA988 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Celeron M P4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,533 vs 2,538).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌5588.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 9W.
❌Older platform position on PGA988, while Atom x7213RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7213RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7213RE better than Celeron M P4500?

Yes. Atom x7213RE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7213RE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7213RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7213RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7213RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7213RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2010), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of PGA988, 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7213RE vs Celeron M P4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7213RE

The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7213RE and Celeron M P4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE. The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron M P4500 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Celeron M P4500's 2,533 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x7213RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7213RE vs 2 MB on the Celeron M P4500.

Feature	Atom x7213RE	Celeron M P4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+83%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,538	2,533

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron M P4500 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7213RE	Celeron M P4500
Socket	FCBGA1264	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—