Atom Z3735G
VS
Core i7-3520M

Atom Z3735G vs Core i7-3520M

Intel

Atom Z3735G

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-3520M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z3735G is positioned at rank 5 and the Core i7-3520M is on rank 1127, so the Atom Z3735G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z3735G

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
101%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
92%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
91%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
91%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
87%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
84%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
84%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
81%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
75%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
74%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3520M

#1113
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1114
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1115
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1116
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1117
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1119
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1120
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1121
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1122
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1125
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1128
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1129
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1130
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1132
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1133
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1134
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1135
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1136
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1137
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1140
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3520M leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom Z3735G is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($17)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Atom Z3735G stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 95% cheaper ($17 vs $346) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1970%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($17)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z3735G and Core i7-3520M

Intel

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

Intel

Core i7-3520M

The Core i7-3520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,842 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3520M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3735G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-3520M — a 65.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-3520M (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3520M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Core i7-3520M's 2,842 — a 1.7% lead for the Atom Z3735G. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3520M.

FeatureAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
3.6 GHz+97%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.9 GHz+118%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,891+2%
2,842
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-3520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G versus 1600 on the Core i7-3520M — the Core i7-3520M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3520M supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 1 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Core i7-3520M). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3735G) vs 16 (Core i7-3520M) — the Core i7-3520M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3520M).

FeatureAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
Socket
UTFCBGA592
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-RS 1333
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
1 GB+3276700%
32
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3735G) / true (Core i7-3520M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3735G) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3520M rivals AMD A10-5750M.

FeatureAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Atom Z3735G launched at $17 MSRP, while the Core i7-3520M debuted at $346.

FeatureAtom Z3735GCore i7-3520M
MSRP
$17-95%
$346
Release Date
2014
2012