Celeron 1005M vs Phenom II X3 N830

Celeron 1005M vs Phenom II X3 N830 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1005M

2 / 2

1,116

+0.8%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,107

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1005M vs Phenom II X3 N830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1005M vs Phenom II X3 N830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1005M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Phenom II X3 N830 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Phenom II X3 N830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌34033.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 1.5W.

Phenom II X3 N830

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,107 vs 1,116).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1005M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1005M better than Phenom II X3 N830?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X3 N830 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1005M pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1005M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1005M is the better buy right now. Celeron 1005M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X3 N830 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1005M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1005M vs Phenom II X3 N830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Phenom II X3 N830

The Phenom II X3 N830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,107 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1005M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 N830 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 N830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom II X3 N830 — a 10% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 N830. The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X3 N830 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the Phenom II X3 N830's 1,107 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 1005M.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Phenom II X3 N830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.5 MB+200%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,116	1,107
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	607	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 N830 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Phenom II X3 N830
Socket	PGA988	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (Phenom II X3 N830). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X3 N830 requires a dedicated GPU.