Celeron 3867U vs Pentium M 735
Celeron 3867U
Pentium M 735
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3867U is positioned at rank 132 and the Pentium M 735 is on rank 1207, so the Celeron 3867U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3867U
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 735
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 3867U | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 3867U | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3867U and Pentium M 735
Celeron 3867U
The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.
Pentium M 735
The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 3867U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 3867U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+6% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz+6% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-84% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 1,449 | 1,459 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3867U versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Celeron 3867U supports -204.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3867U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3867U) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3867U) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Celeron 3867U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+1500% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget, Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Mobile Legacy |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 3867U and Pentium M 735
