Celeron 3867U vs Pentium M 735

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3867U vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3867U vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3867U

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Pentium M 735 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,449 vs 1,459).
❌2338.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 21W.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 21W instead of 512W, a 491W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Celeron 3867U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3867U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 735 better than Celeron 3867U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 3867U is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 735 is the better buy right now. Pentium M 735 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron 3867U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3867U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3867U vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 3867U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 3867U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+6%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+6%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-84%	90 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,449	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3867U versus DDR-333 on the Pentium M 735 — the Celeron 3867U supports -740.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3867U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3867U) vs 1 (Pentium M 735). PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3867U) vs 0 (Pentium M 735) — the Celeron 3867U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Pentium M 735
Socket	BGA1356	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+1500%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) vs None (Pentium M 735). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium M 735 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget, Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.