Celeron 3867U
VS
Phenom X4 9450e

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X4 9450e

Intel

Celeron 3867U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3867U is positioned at rank 132 and the Phenom X4 9450e is on rank 1093, so the Celeron 3867U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3867U

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
96%
#120
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
304%
#121
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
299%
#122
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
275%
#123
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
273%
#124
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
271%
#126
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
262%
#127
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
251%
#128
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
251%
#129
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
244%
#132
Celeron 3867U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
98%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
97%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9450e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
96506%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
91189%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
66211%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19946%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15800%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13822%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7916%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7813%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
7114%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
7113%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
7034%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6844%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6748%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6721%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6660%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
100%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
96%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
93%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
88%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
81%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
73%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
71%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
70%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
67%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
65%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
61%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
59%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
58%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
57%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
55%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3867U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3867UPhenom X4 9450e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9450e (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3867UPhenom X4 9450e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($430)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3867U and Phenom X4 9450e

Intel

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Phenom X4 9450e

The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9450e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9450e. The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Phenom X4 9450e's 1,455 — a 0.4% lead for the Phenom X4 9450e. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e.

FeatureCeleron 3867UPhenom X4 9450e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,449
1,455
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3867UPhenom X4 9450e
Socket
BGA1356
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) / not specified (Phenom X4 9450e). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X4 9450e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeatureCeleron 3867UPhenom X4 9450e
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget