Celeron 3867U vs Xeon X5272

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3867U vs Xeon X5272 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3867U vs Xeon X5272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3867U

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Xeon X5272 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5272 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,449 vs 1,451).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon X5272

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,172 MSRP, while Celeron 3867U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3867U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5272 better than Celeron 3867U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron 3867U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5272 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5272 is the better buy right now. Xeon X5272 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,172 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3867U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3867U vs Xeon X5272 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

Xeon X5272

The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3867U is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X5272. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5272.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Xeon X5272
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	1,449	1,451

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5272 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3867U versus DDR2 on the Xeon X5272 — the Celeron 3867U supports 106550% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5272 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3867U) vs 4 (Xeon X5272). PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3867U) vs 0 (Xeon X5272) — the Celeron 3867U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-U (Celeron 3867U) and Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon X5272).

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Xeon X5272
Socket	BGA1356	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+106550%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) vs true (Xeon X5272). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X5272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget, Xeon X5272 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.