Celeron 3867U vs Phenom II X3 700e

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom II X3 700e Performance Spectrum

Celeron 3867U

2 / 2

1,449

0.0%

1,451

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom II X3 700e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom II X3 700e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3867U

2019

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Phenom II X3 700e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,449 vs 1,451).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Phenom II X3 700e

2009

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Celeron 3867U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3867U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X3 700e better than Celeron 3867U?

Yes. Phenom II X3 700e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X3 700e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X3 700e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X3 700e is the better buy right now. Phenom II X3 700e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $125 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3867U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom II X3 700e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X3 700e

The Phenom II X3 700e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 700e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 700e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X3 700e — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 700e (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Phenom II X3 700e's 1,451 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X3 700e. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 700e.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Phenom II X3 700e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,449	1,451
Geekbench 6 Single	—	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 3867U versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 700e — the Celeron 3867U supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3867U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3867U) vs 16 (Phenom II X3 700e) — the Phenom II X3 700e offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-U (Celeron 3867U) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 700e).

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Phenom II X3 700e
Socket	BGA1356	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X3 700e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 700e). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom II X3 700e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget, Phenom II X3 700e targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.