Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 3867U

2 / 2

1,449

+0.3%

1,445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3867U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Phenom X3 8750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Phenom X3 8750

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,449).
❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while Celeron 3867U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3867U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X3 8750 better than Celeron 3867U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom X3 8750 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3867U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3867U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom X3 8750 is the better buy right now. Phenom X3 8750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $195 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 3867U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3867U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3867U

The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X3 8750

The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8750. The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3867U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Phenom X3 8750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,449	1,445

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3867U	Phenom X3 8750
Socket	BGA1356	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) / not specified (Phenom X3 8750). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X3 8750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.