Celeron 3867U vs Phenom X3 8750
Celeron 3867U
Phenom X3 8750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3867U is positioned at rank 132 and the Phenom X3 8750 is on rank 1043, so the Celeron 3867U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3867U
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 3867U | Phenom X3 8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 3867U | Phenom X3 8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3867U and Phenom X3 8750
Celeron 3867U
The Celeron 3867U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,449 points. Launch price was $107.
Phenom X3 8750
The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron 3867U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3867U versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8750. The Celeron 3867U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3867U scores 1,449 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 3867U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3867U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Phenom X3 8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Toliman (2008) |
| PassMark | 1,449 | 1,445 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 3867U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Phenom X3 8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3867U) / not specified (Phenom X3 8750). The Celeron 3867U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X3 8750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3867U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3867U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.
| Feature | Celeron 3867U | Phenom X3 8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 3867U and Phenom X3 8750
