Celeron 6305
VS
Core i5-13400F

Celeron 6305 vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron 6305

2 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 6305 is positioned at rank #897 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305

#885
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1512%
#886
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1489%
#887
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1367%
#888
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1361%
#889
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1349%
#891
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1302%
#892
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1249%
#893
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1247%
#894
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1213%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
100%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-13400F delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 6305 in both compute-intensive tasks (169.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core i5-13400F leads not only in performance but also in value. It delivers superior performance at a comparable price point.
InsightCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+436%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 6305 and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 87.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 169.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 744 vs 2,407, a 105.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,236 vs 11,408 (160.9% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
4.6 GHz+156%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB+100%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
2,077
25,029+1105%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
744
2,407+224%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,236
11,408+823%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron 6305) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
Socket
FCBGA1449
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
20+400%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics for 11th Gen
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 6305 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($80 vs $180), the Celeron 6305 is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 26.0 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 137.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 6305Core i5-13400F
MSRP
$107-45%
$196
Avg Price (30d)
$80-56%
$180
Performance per Dollar
26.0
139.1+435%
Release Date
2020
2023