Celeron 6305 vs Core i5-13600K
Celeron 6305
Core i5-13600K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 6305 is positioned at rank #897 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($80) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+355%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($80) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 6305 and Core i5-13600K
Celeron 6305
The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 95.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 179.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 14 / 20+600% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+183% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+25% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,077 | 37,655+1713% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 744 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,236 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron 6305) vs 20 (Core i5-13600K) — the Core i5-13600K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305) and Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K).
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 20+400% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (Celeron 6305) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget, Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 6305 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600K debuted at $329. At current prices ($80 vs $319), the Celeron 6305 is $239 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 26.0 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600K — making the Core i5-13600K the 127.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-67% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-75% | $319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0 | 118.0+354% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 6305 and Core i5-13600K
