Celeron 847 vs Core i3-330E

Intel

Celeron 847

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-330E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 847 vs Core i3-330E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Core i3-330E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Core i3-330E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $43 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
  • Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core i3-330E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-330E

2010

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,260 vs 1,270).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($177 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
  • 105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 847 better than Core i3-330E?
Yes. Celeron 847 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron 847 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 847 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron 847 is the better buy right now. Celeron 847 comes in $43 cheaper on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 33.1% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 847 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 847 vs Core i3-330E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Core i3-330E

The Core i3-330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $177.

Processing Power

The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-330E — a 189.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 847 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-330E uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Core i3-330E's 1,260 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-330E.

FeatureCeleron 847Core i3-330E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz+3567%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.13 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,270
1,260
Geekbench 6 Single
196
Geekbench 6 Multi
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-330E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 847Core i3-330E
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 847) / not specified (Core i3-330E). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core i3-330E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron 847Core i3-330E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Core i3-330E came in at $177. On launch pricing ($134 vs $177), Celeron 847 was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-330E — making the Celeron 847 the 28.4% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 847Core i3-330E
MSRP
$134-24%
$177
Performance per Dollar
9.5+34%
7.1
Release Date
2011
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.