PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 847 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 847 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (354 vs 657).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on BGA1023, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +562.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+800% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 1084.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1023 and older memory support.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
29.9% HIGHER MSRP
$174 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 847 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron 847?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 562.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 85.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 1438.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 562.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 85.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 800% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 29.9% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 562.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1084.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1023, 800% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 847 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 120% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 175.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 196 vs 1,700, a 158.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 354 vs 657 (59.9% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	1.1 GHz	4.4 GHz+300%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+127%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	18 MB (total)+800%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	1,270	19,532+1438%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	196	1,700+767%
Geekbench 6 Multi	354	657+86%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 847) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

Feature	Celeron 847	Core i5-12400F
Socket	BGA1023	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 847) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Gaming Performance/Value

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 847 was priced at $134, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($134 vs $174), Celeron 847 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 9.5 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 168.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 847	Core i5-12400F
MSRP	$134-23%	$174
Performance per Dollar	9.5	112.3+1082%
Release Date	2011	2022

Search Celeron 847 on Amazon

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.