Celeron 877
VS
Ryzen 9 5900X

Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Celeron 877

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 877 is positioned at rank #1097 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 877

#1085
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3135%
#1086
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3089%
#1087
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2835%
#1088
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2823%
#1089
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2797%
#1091
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2701%
#1092
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2590%
#1093
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2585%
#1094
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2516%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X

#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
105%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
104%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
103%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
103%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
103%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
103%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
102%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
102%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
102%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
101%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
101%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
101%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
101%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
100%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
100%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
100%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
100%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
99%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
99%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
99%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
96%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
95%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
95%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
94%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
94%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
94%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 5900X (2020) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 877 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+107%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 877 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Celeron 877 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 109.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 191.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
12 / 24+500%
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
4.8 GHz+243%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.7 GHz+164%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
64 MB+3100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-78%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
805
38,955+4739%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,888
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 877 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 877) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Celeron 877) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

FeatureCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 877) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 877 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. At current prices ($15 vs $350), the Celeron 877 is $335 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 53.7 pts/$ vs 111.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 69.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 877Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP
$86-84%
$549
Avg Price (30d)
$15-96%
$350
Performance per Dollar
53.7
111.3+107%
Release Date
2012
2020