PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 900 vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 900 vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 900

2009

Why buy it

✅+120% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 21W.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 35W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 220).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 229).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 900 better than Pentium M 745?

Yes. Celeron 900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data, 129% better Geekbench multi-core, 4.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 129% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 900 is the better buy right now. Celeron 900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2004). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 900 vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 745 is built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 4.2% lead for the Celeron 900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 100, a 75% lead for the Celeron 900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 229 vs 100 (78.4% advantage for the Celeron 900). L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 745.

Feature	Celeron 900	Pentium M 745
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	485+4%	465
Geekbench 6 Single	220+120%	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	229+129%	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 900 versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Celeron 900 supports 66550% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 900 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 900) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).

Feature	Celeron 900	Pentium M 745
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+66550%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Celeron 900) vs false (Pentium M 745). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.