Celeron 900
Sempron 3500+
Celeron 900 vs Sempron 3500+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 900 vs Sempron 3500+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 900 vs Sempron 3500+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 900
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 62W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Sempron 3500+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Sempron 3500+
2005Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (465 vs 485).
- ❌77.1% higher power demand at 62W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 900 better than Sempron 3500+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 900 vs Sempron 3500+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 900
The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3500+
The Sempron 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $167.
Processing Power
The Sempron 3500+ is built on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Sempron 3500+'s 465 — a 4.2% lead for the Celeron 900. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3500+.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Sempron 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-50% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 485+4% | 465 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 220 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 229 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3500+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Sempron 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 900) / not specified (Sempron 3500+). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Sempron 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 900 and Sempron 3500+
