Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
VS
Core i7-9700K

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is positioned at rank #1098 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#1086
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3145%
#1087
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3099%
#1088
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2845%
#1089
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2832%
#1090
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2806%
#1092
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2710%
#1093
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2598%
#1094
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2594%
#1095
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2524%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
99%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
94%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-9700K (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+188%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Core i7-9700K

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 121.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 168% lead for the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
4.9 GHz+308%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,250
14,397+1052%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
Socket
BGA956
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
16+167%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Mobile
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($50 vs $200), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 25.0 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 96.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Core i7-9700K
MSRP
$134-65%
$385
Avg Price (30d)
$50-75%
$200
Performance per Dollar
25.0
72.0+188%
Release Date
2009
2018